Have Bazooka -- Will Travel

To The Editor:
 
For seven seasons from 1957 through 1963, actor Richard Boone played a gentleman gunslinger named Paladin in the CBS television series, “Have Gun—Will Travel.”
The storyline involved Boone’s character, a highly educated and cultured mercenary whose residence was the Hotel Carlton in wild-West era San Francisco. Paladin’s business card intimated that he had no qualms about using his Colt .45 revolver or his single action Marlin rifle for hire, wherever his career would take him.
This theme, coupled with a common tendency to engage in “overkill” or use of excessive force or action to achieve a goal, often results in awkward phrasing during the legislative process. For instance, when an existing law, or even the absence of a law, raises the ire of a constituent, sometimes legislators are called to address a concern. A legislator will often respond by drafting a bill to create or amend a statute to correct the constituent’s perceived problem.
Thorough analysis is time consuming and frequently the language chosen by a legislator is not properly vetted and is introduced without the legislator being aware of unintended consequences.
I sometimes refer to this process as “using a bazooka to kill a gnat.” Others speak of this phenomenon as “cracking pecans with a sledgehammer.” Most cultures and languages have similar idioms. In China, the literal translation is “killing a chicken with a knife intended for a cow,” and the Russian equivalent is “shooting sparrows with cannon.”
You get the picture. Thus, when the phrase “Have Bazooka – Will Travel” is applied to the legislative process, we all need to speak up about the impact of what could become a bad law. Such is the case with House Bill 2620.  It contains a total prohibition on the ability of a city or a county to require real property to be registered.
There has in fact been an attempt by several cities and towns, particularly in Florida to impose onerous annual registration fees on real property that is vacant or that appears to be vacant, without regard to how well it is maintained.
Unfortunately, Oklahoma’s H.B. 2620 is a classic example of trying to perform eye surgery with a hacksaw. The bill not only totally prohibits registration anywhere in the state, but also invalidates – statewide – all registration requirements that are already on the books.
For instance, many cities and counties require storm shelters and safe rooms to be registered so that after a tornado, emergency workers and police officers will know where to check to make certain that residents are not trapped in shelters by fallen trees or storm debris. H.B. 2620 would void that registration.
Many cities require owners of commercial buildings to register their structures and provide a floor plan with the locations where people may be working, or, in the interest of firefighter safety, where chemicals or materials of an explosive of a noxious nature might be stored. H.B. 2620 would void that registration.
Some cities require that when a loan on a property goes into default, the mortgage company must register the name, address and phone number of the contact person with the mortgage company who is in charge of a property, so that if storm damage, vandalism, or weeds and trash accumulate, contact may be made quickly to alleviate the problem and prevent neighbors from having their property values damaged. H.B. 2620 would void that registration.
It is absolutely true that government should not be allowed to charge fees on well-maintained properties, and should not harm or hinder private property rights without a clearly justified public safety purpose. There should be no imposition on property owners who are maintaining their property and no fee in that situation should be warranted.
Local control is always best. Each city and town best knows and understands the problems that it is required to deal with. Unfortunately, House Bill 2620 is the classic example of “Have Bazooka – Will Travel.”
It is ironic that, as stated in a newspaper editorial published on March 5, “The party that touts the merits and importance of local control is thus pushing to tell municipalities how to conduct their affairs.”
Hopefully the bill will be amended by the Senate to address these serious concerns. With a little tweaking it could be a good law rather than the knee-jerk reaction it currently constitutes.
 
Sincerely,
Rep. David Perryman

Note: Rep. David Perryman, D-Chickasha, can be reached by ‘phone at 405-557-7401 or by email at David.Perryman@okhouse.gov.



Rep. David Perryman

Go Back

Disclaimer:
CapitolBeatOK welcomes letters to the editor. All submissions should be no more than 400 words and e-mailed to editor@capitolbeatok.com. Please include a contact phone number for verification purposes. All letters are subject to editing. Letters to the editor will remain posted for one week at the editor’s discretion.

sign up for email updates

Steal Our Stuff